More annual reporting, this time from Change4Life, which is also a year old. But have the delightful plasticine figures made a difference? Targeting families with children aged 5-11, the strategy has made a definite hit on the brand recognition front and (according to their own tracking group) mothers have made changes to their children’s diet or activity levels. Change4Life analysis also looked at food buying behaviour. In a pilot study using Tesco Clubcard data, researchers found that the Change4Life households did “contain a large proportion of lower income families” and that there had already been some changes in purchasing, such as choosing low-sugar drinks.
Recent articles from BMC Public Health take a slightly more sober view of lifestyle change interventions: Is there a demand for physical activity interventions provided by the healthcare sector? and The influence of a high intensity physical activity intervention on a selection of health related outcomes both provide interesting reading.
Thursday, 11 March 2010
How are we doing?
The Oneplace initiative and the Comprehensive Area Assessment which under pins it, offers the public a scorecard view of local service provision via a website. Oneplace has published a report of its first year, bringing together judgments from a range of inspectorates, including the Audit Commission, the Care Quality Commission, Ofsted and others. The report provides a rather broad brush approach (red and green flags) but includes the usual examples of good practice.
Wednesday, 17 February 2010
Language gap
The educational charity, the Sutton Trust, has published a report on the impact of "cognitive gaps in the early years," as shown especially in language skills. Using the Millennium Cohort Survey, researchers found that children from the poorest families are nearly a year behind their peers from middle income families at age 5. The report identifies good parenting and a supportive home environment as key factors and suggests, amongst other ideas, that outreach projects from Sure Start are the way ahead.
New Deal for Health?
More evaluation of the New Deal for Communities programme (see Fair's Fair 19 January for earlier reports), this time looking at health outcomes. There's a focus on projects in the four NDC case study areas, Fulham, Hackney, Salford and Sandwell, as well as considering more generally how NDC partnerships work and looking at how these kinds of initiatives can be sustained.
A healthy start
The Audit Commission has cast its beady eye over local implementation of government policy for children aged 0-5 during the past ten years. Giving children a healthy start looks at the impact of government funding on the health of under fives, considering how well local agencies manage the finances on offer and how far they are providing value for money. The report also discusses means to improve service delivery to vulnerable and hard-to-reach populations, such as lone and teenage parents and BME groups. Initiatives like Sure Start and the Healthy Child Programme are duly namechecked. However, criticism, when it comes, is reserved for lack of strategic commitment, with under fives' health "not always reflected in strategic plans, and ... rarely given priority in local area agreements (LAAs)." Along with the report, there's also a video showcasing some local initiatives.
February's issue of the European Journal of Public Health has a focus on environmental inequalities and health, ahead of the WHO Ministerial Conference on Environment and Health in Parma on 10-12 March. Articles cover ambient air quality, waste management and housing amongst other topics.
Marmot review published
Poorer people in the UK have shorter lives and are more likely to live with disability is the headline from the Marmot review report, Fair Society, Healthy Lives. The report puts a number on the gap: "the average difference in disabilityfree life expectancy is 17 years." Although the past 10 years have seen a significant rise in spending on healthcare and in general prosperity levels, these inequalities, set out clearly in the Black report of 1980, persist and have deepened.
While the diagnosis may be clear and largely undisputed, the cure is another matter. At a time when the healthcare system, along with broader social welfare policy, is under some financial pressure, this may not be a message governments are prepared to embrace. A guarded welcome from the King's Fund notes that "cash invested in initiatives to tackle health inequalities doesn’t produce instant returns," encouraging the government to stick with the programme. Professor David Hunter, writing in the BMJ, observes "eerie echoes " with the timing of the Black report, which, although commissioned by a Labour government, was issued into the hands of a Conservative one, remarking also that "there are few votes in health inequalities."
While the diagnosis may be clear and largely undisputed, the cure is another matter. At a time when the healthcare system, along with broader social welfare policy, is under some financial pressure, this may not be a message governments are prepared to embrace. A guarded welcome from the King's Fund notes that "cash invested in initiatives to tackle health inequalities doesn’t produce instant returns," encouraging the government to stick with the programme. Professor David Hunter, writing in the BMJ, observes "eerie echoes " with the timing of the Black report, which, although commissioned by a Labour government, was issued into the hands of a Conservative one, remarking also that "there are few votes in health inequalities."
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)