Wednesday, 26 January 2011
Sliding Scale
A team from the Universities of Essex and Toronto have analysed national household panel surveys in the UK, Germany, Denmark and the USA, focusing on inequalities in self-related health for working age adults. They were looking at trajectories of self-related health over a seven-year period and how these could be seen to relate to national welfare policies.
Healthy Eating Round-up
Recently published wisdom on the subject includes:
A cost-effectiveness analysis of public policies designed to increase fruit and vegetable consumption in the European Journal of Public Health. Its authors conclude that VAT reductions work better than food stamps in terms of life years saved and that information campaigns are the most cost-effective (no surprises there!). An earlier issue of EJPH also included findings from a panel discusion on monetary incentives in promoting healthy eating.
From New Zealand there's a study on the effects of a free school breakfast programme on attendance, achievement, nutrition and wellbeing.
There's also a protocol for a study in promoting a healthy diet and physical activity in adults with learning disabilities (from BMC).
A cost-effectiveness analysis of public policies designed to increase fruit and vegetable consumption in the European Journal of Public Health. Its authors conclude that VAT reductions work better than food stamps in terms of life years saved and that information campaigns are the most cost-effective (no surprises there!). An earlier issue of EJPH also included findings from a panel discusion on monetary incentives in promoting healthy eating.
From New Zealand there's a study on the effects of a free school breakfast programme on attendance, achievement, nutrition and wellbeing.
There's also a protocol for a study in promoting a healthy diet and physical activity in adults with learning disabilities (from BMC).
Tuesday, 25 January 2011
Children's Centres
The Commission for Rural Communities makes a bid for the value of children's centres in rural areas to be acknowledged. The government has made it clear in the 2010 Spending Review and elsewhere that it wishes the Sure Start programme and Children's Centres to be "refocused on its original purpose of improving the life chances of disadvantaged children." In the light of this, it's not clear how influential this commissioning guide will be with cash-strapped local authorities or other likely commissioners.
Labels:
Child Poverty,
Commissioning,
Rural communities,
Sure Start
Child Poverty
A recent consultation from the Department for Education considers strategies for reducing child poverty in the present economically straightened circumstances. Tackling Child Poverty and Improving Life Chances is informed by two recent independent reviews commissioned by the Coalition Government: Frank Field's review of poverty and life chances (which reported in early December) and Graham Allen's review of early intervention (which reported more recently). However, the whole project is tied to commitments under the Child Poverty Act 2010, which requires government to publish a strategy setting out how it will attempt to tackle this issue.
Responses are due in by 15 February 2011.
Responses are due in by 15 February 2011.
Indicators
Recently APHO published health inequality indicators for each English local authority, rather than at PCT level, as had previously been the case. Data covers the period 2005-9 and uses the slope index for inequality (SII) for life expectancy at birth. SII is a single figure which shows the gap between poorest and most well-off in each area. This is based on analysing the relationship between life expectancy and deprivation figures (using the Index of Multiple Deprivation) for the whole local authority. This way of presenting inequalities data at the level was proposed in the Public Health Outcomes Framework. SII has been widely used for sometime and is good at offering clear comparison between health of wealthiest and poorest.
Wednesday, 19 January 2011
Not a good report
The UK has not scored too well on UNICEF's Innocenti Report Card 9 survey of inequality in child wellbeing amongst the richer countries, The Children Left Behind. Focusing on OECD states, the report looks at health, educational and material wellbeing, and assesses how far the most disadvantaged children have fallen behind those at median level. Using this kind of measure, the UK ranks alongside Hungary, Slovakia and the Czech Republic, in the bottom two- fifths of countries, principally on the basis of a low ranking in material wellbeing.
At the beginning
The Family Nurse Partnership gets another ringing endorsement in a report from DH. Providing "intensive support" for young parents, the scheme has been described as showing "good potential." This is the third evaluation report for the FNP and it follows the first cohort of clients, looking at how the programme supports families where the children are between 12 and 24 months. Andrew Lansley announced in October that the FNP would be doubled in capacity by 2015.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)